|
Big Idea: Demonstrating a
Critical Stance (Reading) Demonstrating a critical stance requires readers to
consider the text objectively in order to evaluate its |
|
|
quality and appropriateness. It involves a range of tasks,
including critical evaluation, comparing and |
|
|
contrasting, and understanding the impact of features such as
irony, humor, and organization. Knowledge |
|
|
of text content and structure is important. |
|
|
Academic Expectations |
|
|
1.1 Students use reference
tools such as dictionaries, almanacs, encyclopedias, and computer |
|
|
reference programs and research tools. |
|
|
1.2 Students make sense of
the variety of materials they read. |
|
|
1.3 Students make sense of
the various things they observe. |
|
|
1.4 Students make sense of
the various messages to which they listen. |
|
|
5.1 Students use critical
thinking skills such as analyzing, prioritizing, categorizing, evaluating,
and |
|
|
comparing to solve a variety of problems in real-life
situations. |
|
|
High School Enduring
Knowledge Understandings |
|
|
Students will understand
that |
|
|
|
reading is a process that
includes applying a variety of strategies to comprehend, interpret, and |
|
|
evaluate texts; showing
evidence of responsible and warranted interpretations of text; and |
|
|
examining texts critically. |
|
|
references from texts provide
evidence to support judgments made about why and how the text |
|
|
was developed, considering the content, organization
and form. |
|
|
determining the usefulness of
text for a specific purpose, evaluating language and textual |
|
|
elements, and analyzing the authors style are all ways to
critically examine texts. |
|
|
all citizens need to analyze
a wide variety of media messages (e.g., political, financial, social, |
|
|
environmental) in order to interpret matters of public policy and
personal interest. |
|
|
judging the credibility of
sources, evaluating arguments, and understanding and conveying |
|
|
information are essential
skills needed for postsecondary education, the workplace, and in |
|
|
exercising the rights of citizenship. |
|
Big Idea: Demonstrating a Critical Stance (Reading)
Continued |
|
|
Grades 9 & 10 Skills and Concepts |
|
|
Students will |
|
|
|
analyze the effectiveness of
text features in organizing information for clarity or for usefulness |
|
|
identify organizational
patterns and describe how understanding the structure helps to |
|
|
understand the text; analyze
the organizational pattern used (e.g., description, sequence, |
|
|
cause/effect,
compare/contrast, logical/sequential, problem/solution, proposition/support, |
|
|
deductive/inductive) and
explain how effective it is in understanding the passage and meeting the |
|
|
authors purpose |
|
|
evaluate what is read, based
on the authors purpose, message, word choice, sentence variety, |
|
|
content, tone, style or use
of literary elements |
|
|
form and support warranted
judgments/opinions/conclusions about central ideas |
|
|
interpret the interactions
between and among literary elements within and across a variety of |
|
|
texts |
|
|
analyze the effectiveness of
literary devices or figurative language in evoking what the author |
|
|
intended (e.g., picturing a
setting, predicting a consequence, establishing a mood or feeling) |
|
|
make comparisons and
synthesize information within and across texts (e.g., comparing themes, |
|
|
ideas, concept development,
literary elements, events, genres) |
|
|
evaluate the accuracy of
information presented in texts |
|
|
evaluate arguments, interpret
and analyze information from multiple sources; for example, |
|
|
synthesize arguments or
claims to discover the relationship between the parts, understand |
|
|
induction and deduction,
determine unstated assumptions |
|
|
identify claims and evidences
and evaluate connections among evidences and inferences |
|
|
evaluate the range and
quality of evidence used to support or oppose an argument |
|
|
recognize common logical
fallacies (e.g., personal attacks, non-sequitor,
faulty cause-effect) and |
|
|
false premises in an argument
|